The first Virtual Webmaster Unconference successfully took place on August 26th and, as promised, we'd like to share the main findings and conclusions here. As communicated before, this event was a pilot, in which we wanted to test a if there was an appetite for a very different type of event, and b whether the community would actively engage in the discussions. To the first question, we were overwhelmed with the interest to participate; it definitely exceeded our expectations and it gives us fuel to try out future iterations. Despite the frustration of many, who did not receive an invitation, we purposefully kept the event small. This brings us to our second point: it is by creating smaller venues that discussions can happen comfortably. Larger audiences are perfect for more conventional conferences, with keynotes and panels. The Virtual Webmaster Unconference, however, was created to hear the attendees' voices. And we did.
Онлайн-расследование ссылок — с мгновенным результатом
What did we learn in the sessions?
Trust Flow represents the quality of links that point to URLs and websites. A web page with higher Trust Flow than Citation Flow will usually have good-quality links. Citation Flow is a score which reflects the quantity of links that point to any given website. Citation Flow does not care whether a link is of good-quality, or poor quality. The Visibility Flow score helps you to find desirable editorial-style links on high Trust Flow pages, rather than directory-style links even when the directory Trust Flow is high. With a score that shows where a website is positioned compared to the very best sites in over categories, Topical Trust Flow illustrates the topical relevancy of a web page. Each score represents a different measure of the impact of your content. Gain great insight from investigating where the balance between Flow Metric scores differ from the norm. Link Context is exclusive to Majestic, and gives you an entirely new way to discover and audit backlinks.
How did the event go?
At the recent Search Engine Strategies conference in freezing Chicago, many of us Googlers were asked questions about duplicate content. We recognize that there are many nuances and a bit of confusion on the topic, so we'd like to help set the record straight. Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar. Most of the time when we see this, it's unintentional or at least not malicious in origin: forums that generate both regular and stripped-down mobile-targeted pages, store items shown and -- worse yet -- linked via multiple distinct URLs, and so on. In some cases, content is duplicated across domains in an attempt to manipulate search engine rankings or garner more traffic via popular or long-tail queries. Though we do offer a handy translation utility , our algorithms won't view the same article written in English and Spanish as duplicate content. Similarly, you shouldn't worry about occasional snippets quotes and otherwise being flagged as duplicate content. Our users typically want to see a diverse cross-section of unique content when they do searches. In contrast, they're understandably annoyed when they see substantially the same content within a set of search results. Also, webmasters become sad when we show a complex URL example.
I met my ex when he was a 2nd year resident and married him when he completed his oncology fellowship. The church really needs to tailor to more partial LDS families, imho. Anonymous, You are definitely one of the the club.